<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still Photographers as Amateur Videographers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/2010/07/still-photographers-as-amateur-videographers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/2010/07/still-photographers-as-amateur-videographers/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Your Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:00:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Dutile</title>
		<link>http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/2010/07/still-photographers-as-amateur-videographers/comment-page-1/#comment-17113</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Dutile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/?p=3106#comment-17113</guid>
		<description>Quite true. I&#039;m starting to dabble in a bit of video as another creative outlet and it&#039;s a whole other world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite true. I&#8217;m starting to dabble in a bit of video as another creative outlet and it&#8217;s a whole other world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Maddox</title>
		<link>http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/2010/07/still-photographers-as-amateur-videographers/comment-page-1/#comment-16986</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Maddox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/?p=3106#comment-16986</guid>
		<description>Amen. I wrote something similar in one of my blogs back in January. At the time I was hearing so many pro still photographers talk about getting into video. This due for the most part on some video capabilities being packaged into DSLR cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen. I wrote something similar in one of my blogs back in January. At the time I was hearing so many pro still photographers talk about getting into video. This due for the most part on some video capabilities being packaged into DSLR cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/2010/07/still-photographers-as-amateur-videographers/comment-page-1/#comment-16976</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 05:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/?p=3106#comment-16976</guid>
		<description>Great post!  Thank you!

I&#039;ve been going on and on about this myself.  I&#039;m dabbling in video now, but have no illusions that I&#039;m going to make any appreciable income from it versus my still work.  

Aside from the technical aspects of video, the years of training it must take, and the equipment purchases/fabrication, my primary concern is becoming one of the under-priced &quot;good enough&quot; amateurs who undercut video pros in my town.  I haven&#039;t a clue what to price or how to license motion footage.

Further, I doubt the majority of us still guys will be readily accepted in the video world.  It wouldn&#039;t shock me that us amateur video guys might be viewed to video pros with same disdain we view all the DSLR amateurs moving into our field and taking work from us at cutthroat or free pricing.

I think anyone interested in adding video services should network with seasoned video companies, tread lightly at first, learn the craft, and exercise some humility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  Thank you!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been going on and on about this myself.  I&#8217;m dabbling in video now, but have no illusions that I&#8217;m going to make any appreciable income from it versus my still work.  </p>
<p>Aside from the technical aspects of video, the years of training it must take, and the equipment purchases/fabrication, my primary concern is becoming one of the under-priced &#8220;good enough&#8221; amateurs who undercut video pros in my town.  I haven&#8217;t a clue what to price or how to license motion footage.</p>
<p>Further, I doubt the majority of us still guys will be readily accepted in the video world.  It wouldn&#8217;t shock me that us amateur video guys might be viewed to video pros with same disdain we view all the DSLR amateurs moving into our field and taking work from us at cutthroat or free pricing.</p>
<p>I think anyone interested in adding video services should network with seasoned video companies, tread lightly at first, learn the craft, and exercise some humility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

