<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Killer Contradictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/2010/03/killer-contradictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/2010/03/killer-contradictions/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Your Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:00:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisha Sitz</title>
		<link>http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/2010/03/killer-contradictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10226</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisha Sitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/?p=2379#comment-10226</guid>
		<description>Thankyou, this is extremely nice info, thankyou.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankyou, this is extremely nice info, thankyou.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/2010/03/killer-contradictions/comment-page-1/#comment-8188</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/?p=2379#comment-8188</guid>
		<description>One more thing.  

&quot;If anyone is reading this then ignore Leslie’s post and go out and focus on your work, your vision, your projects and stop looking for ‘quick fixes’ to a sustainable long term business in photography.&quot;

How about going out and focusing on your work, your vision, your projects and stop trying to be a web designer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing.  </p>
<p>&#8220;If anyone is reading this then ignore Leslie’s post and go out and focus on your work, your vision, your projects and stop looking for ‘quick fixes’ to a sustainable long term business in photography.&#8221;</p>
<p>How about going out and focusing on your work, your vision, your projects and stop trying to be a web designer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/2010/03/killer-contradictions/comment-page-1/#comment-8187</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/?p=2379#comment-8187</guid>
		<description>Why the chip, Dan?

First, two wrongs don&#039;t make a right.  And secondly, if you know anything about Leslie, you know she doesn&#039;t advocate making super fancy websites that get in the way of the images.  She really likes Livebooks for heavens sake.  By the way, if you didn&#039;t already know, most professionals would agree that your website is your most important marketing aspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the chip, Dan?</p>
<p>First, two wrongs don&#8217;t make a right.  And secondly, if you know anything about Leslie, you know she doesn&#8217;t advocate making super fancy websites that get in the way of the images.  She really likes Livebooks for heavens sake.  By the way, if you didn&#8217;t already know, most professionals would agree that your website is your most important marketing aspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie BDA</title>
		<link>http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/2010/03/killer-contradictions/comment-page-1/#comment-8186</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie BDA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/?p=2379#comment-8186</guid>
		<description>Dan: This post has NOTHING to do with what OTHERS do. It is about what each photographer can do for the betterment of his/her own biz. Plenty of designers, etc., respect copyright and plenty of photogs do not. Many more designers license work than you state. Most clients run their businesses in ethical ways.

But even if they do not, that is no excuse for anyone to act as poorly. Just because the other guy acts like a jerk does not give anyone else permission to so act.

Rise above the anger and bitterness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan: This post has NOTHING to do with what OTHERS do. It is about what each photographer can do for the betterment of his/her own biz. Plenty of designers, etc., respect copyright and plenty of photogs do not. Many more designers license work than you state. Most clients run their businesses in ethical ways.</p>
<p>But even if they do not, that is no excuse for anyone to act as poorly. Just because the other guy acts like a jerk does not give anyone else permission to so act.</p>
<p>Rise above the anger and bitterness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/2010/03/killer-contradictions/comment-page-1/#comment-8184</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/?p=2379#comment-8184</guid>
		<description>Correction: Line 11 (of text) reads: &#039;reputation&#039; and should read &#039;reputable&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction: Line 11 (of text) reads: &#8216;reputation&#8217; and should read &#8216;reputable&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/2010/03/killer-contradictions/comment-page-1/#comment-8183</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/?p=2379#comment-8183</guid>
		<description>Oh this is rich.

Probably the biggest bunch of infringers of copyright against professional photographers are graphic artist and designers (most of which declare themselves web designers).

They have very very very little respect for paying &#039;fair value&#039; for digital rights to high quality photography for use in their clients projects.

99% of web designers will acquire &#039;low/amateur&#039; grade photographic imagery for use in a clients project. They will source this from Flicker creative commons if they can find it or they will shell out $10 at a micro stock photography site.

1% of web designers will encourage clients to source custom imagery from professional photographers. Thats being generous.

And this is just the reputation web designers!

How many &#039;off the grid&#039; dodgy freelance web designers just steal copyright imagery and use it on clients websites without the client even knowing?

Answer: Most of them.

I could name at least 5 world class professional photographers who have purchased a website template, conducted their own minor amendments (php/css and html is not hard) and guess what Leslie? Their websites are outstanding. Why? Because their website doesnt get in the way of their content - their photography - which speaks far louder than any fancy over designed website would.

Websites DO NOT bring in sustainable long term income. Relationships with people bring in long term sustainable income.

No one is going to call in your &#039;book&#039; on the back of some trendy typography on your website.

If anyone is reading this then ignore Leslie&#039;s post and go out and focus on your work, your vision, your projects and stop looking for &#039;quick fixes&#039; to a sustainable long term business in photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh this is rich.</p>
<p>Probably the biggest bunch of infringers of copyright against professional photographers are graphic artist and designers (most of which declare themselves web designers).</p>
<p>They have very very very little respect for paying &#8216;fair value&#8217; for digital rights to high quality photography for use in their clients projects.</p>
<p>99% of web designers will acquire &#8216;low/amateur&#8217; grade photographic imagery for use in a clients project. They will source this from Flicker creative commons if they can find it or they will shell out $10 at a micro stock photography site.</p>
<p>1% of web designers will encourage clients to source custom imagery from professional photographers. Thats being generous.</p>
<p>And this is just the reputation web designers!</p>
<p>How many &#8216;off the grid&#8217; dodgy freelance web designers just steal copyright imagery and use it on clients websites without the client even knowing?</p>
<p>Answer: Most of them.</p>
<p>I could name at least 5 world class professional photographers who have purchased a website template, conducted their own minor amendments (php/css and html is not hard) and guess what Leslie? Their websites are outstanding. Why? Because their website doesnt get in the way of their content &#8211; their photography &#8211; which speaks far louder than any fancy over designed website would.</p>
<p>Websites DO NOT bring in sustainable long term income. Relationships with people bring in long term sustainable income.</p>
<p>No one is going to call in your &#8216;book&#8217; on the back of some trendy typography on your website.</p>
<p>If anyone is reading this then ignore Leslie&#8217;s post and go out and focus on your work, your vision, your projects and stop looking for &#8216;quick fixes&#8217; to a sustainable long term business in photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/2010/03/killer-contradictions/comment-page-1/#comment-8179</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asmp.org/strictlybusiness/?p=2379#comment-8179</guid>
		<description>Ouch! Good points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch! Good points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

